|Year : 2006 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 90-96
Loss of space and changes in the dental arch after premature loss of the lower primary molar: A longitudinal study
Padma Kumari B, Retna Kumari N
Dept. of Pedodontics, Govt. Dental College, Trivandrum, India
Padma Kumari B
Dept. of Pedodontics, Govt. Dental College, Trivandrum
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the space changes, dental arch width, arch length and arch perimeter, after the unilateral extraction of lower first primary molar in the mixed dentition period. A longitudinal study was conducted among forty children in the age group of 6-9 years, who reported for extraction of lower first primary molar in the department of Pedodontics, Govt. Dental College, Trivandrum. Study models were made from alginate impression taken before extraction and after extraction at the periodical intervals of two months, four months, six months and eight months. The mesiodistal width of lower first primary molar of the non-extracted side was taken as the control. The results of the study showed statistically significant space loss in the extraction side ( P value <0.01) and no significant space loss in the control side ( P value > 0.05). The rate of loss was greatest in the first four months. The arch width, arch length and arch perimeter had no significant change from initial to eight months follow up. The present study challenges the use of a space maintenance under the circumstances of premature loss of mandibular primary molar for preventing space loss.
Keywords: Arch length, arch perimeter, arch width, space loss
|How to cite this article:|
B P, N R. Loss of space and changes in the dental arch after premature loss of the lower primary molar: A longitudinal study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2006;24:90-6
|How to cite this URL:|
B P, N R. Loss of space and changes in the dental arch after premature loss of the lower primary molar: A longitudinal study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent [serial online] 2006 [cited 2013 May 22];24:90-6. Available from: http://www.jisppd.com/text.asp?2006/24/2/90/26023
| Introduction|| |
Pedodontists have traditionally accepted active supervision of the developing dentition as major responsibility. Management of space problems associated with the transitional stages from primary to permanent dentition is a routine component of pedodontic practice. The change from primary dentition to the permanent dentition is a complex phenomenon, which is composed of a variety of physiological adaptations of occlusion during this period. The exfoliation of the primary teeth, the permanent teeth eruption and the occlusion through independent, occur in a harmonious sequence., There are many morphogenetic and environmental influences, which manage the occlusal development and a disorder or deviation in any of these elements may influence the occlusion. Among these elements, there is the importance of the primary teeth because when they are physiologically exfoliated, there is a favourable alveolar growth and space for a better accommodation of the successor permanent teeth. The permanent teeth dislocation occurs in the eruptive, pre functional and functional periods of the eruption, that are within the primary arch and in the mixed dentition stage.,,,
Richardson observed that the most severe space problems happen when the primary teeth, in particular the first primary molars are exfoliated before the eruption of the permanent molar. The premature loss of the primary molars that results in mesial positioning of the first permanent molar is of a great concern during the mixed dentition. Love and Adams found a greater percentage of space loss by mesial migration of the posterior teeth than distal migration of the anterior teeth, especially in the mandible. In majority of children, the occlusion and space would be influenced by premature extraction of primary molars and canines.
Growth and development and drifting patterns of teeth are closely interdependent. In the field of pediatric dentistry much emphasis should be put on these factors in order to secure the optimal benefit of systematic dental care for the child. It is well known that after early loss of deciduous molars dental arch crowding arises in some cases, while in other cases it does not. It has been suggested that large jaws with normal spacing or over spacing are not influenced by the premature loss of the deciduous teeth. A tendency towards small jaws and space deficiency in the deciduous arch, on the other hand, will probably cause closure of the extraction gap resulting in crowding in the permanent dentition. Premature loss of a primary tooth is of concern not only because of the loss of function, but also because of the increased possibility that the other teeth may drift. It would be useful in determining the treatment, if the dentist could predict the sequel of premature loss of primary teeth.
As the premature loss of primary teeth is still a very common situation within the population, this study was undertaken using longitudinal cast data to investigate the changes after unilateral premature extraction of the mandibular first primary molar in the mixed dentition stage.
| Aim and Objectives|| |
1. To evaluate the space changes in the extracted site.
2. To determine the changes in dental arch width.
3. To observe changes in the dental arch width.
4. To evaluate the changes in the dental arch perimeter.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Forty children for the study. The patients were in the age group of 6-9 years, who had reported for extraction of lower first primary molar in the Department of Pedodontics, Govt. Dental college, Thiruvananthapuram for an evaluation of thirteen months. The selected patients were made as homogenous as possible. In the final stage of the study, the number of patients decreased to 30, as ten children did not come for further follow up and they were excluded from the study.
All the cases complied with the following criteria
1. The first permanent molars have erupted.
2. Patients indicated for unilateral extraction of mandibular first primary molar due to extensive decay and having an intact anterior tooth.
3. The anteroposterior and lateral arch relationships were acceptable.
4. Premature loss of the primary molar was defined as having an unerupted permanent predecessor for at least two years after extraction of the deciduous first molar.
5. Parents and guardians who were willing to overweigh the effects of not maintaining the extraction space.
At the start of the study, the children were subjected to a clinical examination and the medical and dental history of the child was taken. Mandibular study models were prepared from alginate impressions before extraction and immediately after the impression procedure, the decayed first molar was extracted. No space maintaining appliance was advocated. Longitudinally, the procedure was repeated at each follow up after two, four, six and eight months after extraction. Thus each patient was subjected to evaluation at five stages. The opposite non-extraction side was taken as the control. Two dental arch models of each patient prior to extraction and four models after the extraction of lower first primary molar were used for the study.
Measurements on the casts
Four measurements concerning dental arch development were performed on the extraction space, arch width, arch length and arch perimeter using a measuring gauge.
The referent space was determined by measuring the distance between the mesial midpoint of the second deciduous molar and the distal midpoint of the primary canine [Figure - 1][Figure - 2].
The arch width was measured between the central fossae on the occlusal surface of two second primary molars [Figure - 3].
The arch length was determined by the orthogonal distance of the median point between the central incisors until the tangent line to the distal face of the second primary molars or mesial surface of the first permanent molars [Figure - 4].
The arch perimeter was the measurement of the arc from the mesial midpoint of the first permanent molar, through the cusp tip of the first permanent molars. It was measured by the brass wire method. Measurements were repeated three times using different caliper from which an average value of the measurement in millimeter was recorded and analysed [Figure - 5].
The analysis was done with Statistical Package for Social Science Soft ware (SPSS) programme. Paired 't' test was used for the comparison of measurement of all parameters.
| Results|| |
The present study, was undertaken to evaluate the loss of space and change in the dental arch after premature loss of lower first primary molar among thirty children in the age group of 6-9 years brought the results. The measurement of the mesiodistal width of lower first primary molar on both control and extraction side, before extraction and following 2, 4, 6 and 8 months after extraction are shown in table. It was observed that there was a space loss in the extraction side and no space in the control side. It was also noted that space loss was maximum during the first four months and consequently space loss was minimum during the period of six to eight months. The result showed statistically significant space loss in the extraction side ( P < 0.01) compared to the control side, which is not statistically significant ( P >0.05).
Comparison of the space changes of the lower first primary molar between the initial and follow up examinations during 2 months, 4 months, 6 months and 8 months in both control and extraction side are shown in [Table - 2] and [Figure - 6]a-e. The first primary molar space of the extraction side during the follow up examinations after 2 months (7.72 ±0.56), 4 months (7.03 ± 0.56), 6 months (6.62 ± 0.56) and 8months (6.64 ± 0.44), were significantly lesser than the control side. There are statistically significant difference between the initial and the follow up examination in the extraction side. No significant difference is noted between the control side and the extraction side in the initial first primary molar space.
Quantity of space loss in millimeter after the premature loss of lower first primary molar is shown in [Table - 3]. Space reduction in the analyzed dental arch were measured to be 1.31 mm, 1.69 mm, 1.41 mm and 1.22 mm during the monitoring in 2 months, 4 months, 6 months and 8 months respectively. Shows the mean changes of space reduction in control side and extraction side during the period from initial to eight months.
Measurements of arch width were analysed and the results showed no significant change in the arch width between the initial and the follow up examinations at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months intervals.
The measurements of arch length from initial and follow up examinations reveal no statistically significant change.
No statistically significant changes observed in the arch perimeter in the initial examination to follow up examinations.
| Discussion|| |
Research dealing with space changes in the dental arch is difficult to perform accurately because of the multifactorial variance influencing the results. Most of the reports of research studies were based on cross sectional data, limited sample size and crude methodology that had led to misconceptions of space changes of the dental arch in maxillary or mandibular arch. The present study tried to minimize the errors conducting a longitudinal study by using strict homogenous samples and focusing on unilateral extraction of the mandibular first primary molar.
The present study was carried out to find out the space loss due to the unilateral premature extraction of the lower first primary molar. There is statistically significant space loss in the extraction side ( P value<0.01) and no significant space loss in the control side ( P value>0.05). The space changes in the extraction side measured by the first primary molar space after eight months (6.4 ± 0.44 mm) have shown significant space loss compared to the initial first primary molar space (8.23 ± 0.52 mm) and the control side (8.31 ± 0.52 mm).
The result of the present study confirm with the conclusion of the studies of Helm, Owen and Yng-Tzer J, Lin and Li-Ching Chang.,, They reported that space loss was more common in the mandibular arch after the premature loss of first primary molar. The results of the present study partly support the conclusions that space in the mandible is lost by both mesial migration of posterior teeth and distal movement of anterior teeth as reported by Osmar Aparecide Cuoghi et al .
The mean changes of space loss in the present study are 1.31 mm after 2 months, 1.69 mm after 4 months, 1.41 mm after 6 months and 1.22 mm after 8 months. It is noted that space loss is maximum during the first four months and minimum is last four months. Concerning the rate of space change, the greatest space loss occurred in the first four months. The study reveals significant space loss during the average eight months of experimental period.
It appears in the present study that the space loss in the mandible is mostly due to distal movement of primary cuspid during the following eight months. The possible explanation is that the erupting anterior incisors pushed the primary cuspid towards the distal more than the erupting first permanent molar did on the second primary molar towards the mesial. The findings of the present study support the findings to Johnsen that the space changes occurred mainly by the distal migration of primary cuspid in the intial stage.
The present study also investigated the changes in the arch width, arch length and arch perimeter. No significant change in the arch width, arch length and arch perimeter from initial and the follow up examinations at 2 months, 4 months, 6 months and 8 months was observed. Lundstrom emphasized the importance of inheritance of dental arch, the exfoliation period, occlusal developmental stages and influences in the dental arch perimeter.
Briefly, the space loss is mainly, by movement of the primary cuspids distally and by a lesser degree by movement of the first permanent molar and second primary molar mesially, depending on the period of the referred tooth absence.
The following conclusions are drawn from the present study
1. The premature loss of the lower first primary molar in the mixed dentition resulted in statistically significant space loss in the extraction side than in the control side.
2. The early space change of the mandibular dental arch after premature loss of the mandibular primary first molar is mostly by distal movement of the primary cuspid towards the extraction space.
3. There is significant space change during the average eight months of experimental period. The greatest space loss is observed in the first four months after the premature extraction.
4. There is no significant space change in arch width, arch length and arch perimeter in the mandibular arch after premature loss of the primary first molar during the experimental period of eight months after extraction.
The present study challenges the use of a space maintenance under the circumstances of premature loss of mandibular primary molar for preventing space loss.
Further studies are needed to be done, regarding not only on space problems of primary first molars, but also involving the second primary molars in either the maxillary or mandibular arch.
| References|| |
|1.||Foster TD, Hamilton MC. Occlusion in primary dentitions. Br Dent J 1960;126:76-9. |
|2.||Moyers RE. Ortodontia. 4th ed. Cuanabara Koogan: Rio de Janeiro; 1991. p. 107-8. |
|3.||Baume U. Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion. The biogenetic course of the deciduous dentition. J Dent Res 1950;29:123-32. |
|4.||Johnsen DC. Space observation following loss of the mandibular first primary molars in mixed dentition. J Dent Child 1980;47:24-7. [PUBMED] |
|5.||Singh IJ. Space maintenance a review. J All India DA 1960;32:191-7. |
|6.||Colisti UP, Cohen MM, Fales MH. Correlation between malocclusion oral habits and socioeconomic level of preschool children. J Dent Res 1960;39:450-4. |
|7.||Keonfeld SM. Effects of premature loss of primary teeth and sequence of eruption of permanent teeth on malocclusion. J Dent Child 1953;20:2-13. |
|8.||Richardson. The relationship between the relative amount of space present in the deciduous dental arch and the rate and degree of space closure to the extraction of a deciduous molar. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1965;16:111-8. |
|9.||Love WD, Adams RL. Tooth movement into edentulous areas. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:271-8. [PUBMED] |
|10.||Ronnerman A, Thilander B. Early loss of primary molars relationship to space conditions, dental development, facial morphology and the need for orthodontic treatment. Thesis: Gotherburg; 1977. |
|11.||Helm S. Prevalence of malocclusion in relation to the development of the dentition. Acta Odont Scand 1970;28:1. |
|12.||Owen DG. The incidence and nature of space closure following the premature extraction of deciduous teeth. A literature survey. J Orthod 1971;59:3749. [PUBMED] |
|13.||Cuoghi OA, Bertoz FA, de Mendonca MR, Santos EC. Loss of space and dental arch length after the loss of the lower first primary molar: A longitudinal study. J Clin Pediatric Dent 1998;22:117-20. [PUBMED] |
|14.||Lin YT, Chang LC. Spaces after premature loss of the mandibular primary first molar: A longitudinal study. J Clin Pediat Dent 1998;22:311-6. [PUBMED] |
|15.||Johnsen DC. Space observation following loss of the mandibular first primary molars in mixed dentition. J Dent Child 1980;47:247. [PUBMED] |
|16.||Lundstrom A. The significance of early loss of deciduous teeth in the etiology of malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1955;41:819-26. |
[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4], [Figure - 5], [Figure - 6]
[Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3], [Table - 4], [Table - 5], [Table - 6]
|This article has been cited by|
||Rationale for restoration of carious primary teeth: A review
| || |
| ||European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2012; 13(6): 281 |
||Twelve-month space changes after premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar : Space changes after loss of a primary first molar
| ||YAI-TIN LIN, WEN-HSIEN LIN, YNG-TZER J. LIN |
| ||International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2011; 21(3): 161 |
||Space changes after premature loss of deciduous molars among Brazilian children
| ||Maria Carolina Bandeira Macena, Cintia Regina Tornisiello Katz, Mônica Vilela Heimer, Juliana Freire de Oliveira e Silva, Luana Batista Costa |
| ||American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2011; 140(6): 771 |
||Distribution of certain types of occlusal anomalies among Saudi Arabian adolescents in Jeddah city
| ||Murshid, Z.A., Amin, H.E., Al-Nowaiser, A.M. |
| ||Community Dental Health. 2010; 27(4): 238-241 |
||Understanding the process
| ||Kamp, A.A. |
| ||Journal of the American Dental Association. 2010; 141(5): 502 |
| ||Laing, E., Ashley, P., Naini, F.B., Gill, D.S. |
| ||International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2009; 19(3): 155-162 |