Home | About Us | Editorial Board | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Official publication of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
 Users Online: 1847  
 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
CASE REPORT
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 35-37
 

Ankylosis of primary molar along with congenitally missing first permanent molar


Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, India

Correspondence Address:
B S Suprabha
'Shreyas', 5th Cross Road, Shivabagh, Kadri, Mangalore - 2, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 16891750

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

 

  Abstract 

Ankylosis of primary mandibular molars has been routinely found to be associated with various developmental disturbances in permanent dentition such as aplasia of the succedaneous tooth, ectopic eruption of the premolar, infraoclusion of the ankylosed tooth leading to tipping of the first permanent molar etc. This article describes a rare case where there was ankylosis of a mandibular second primary molar along with congenitally missing first permanent molar which resulted in the transposition of second premolar. Treatment options and prognosis of the case are discussed.


Keywords: Congenitally missing teeth, tooth ankylosis, transposition


How to cite this article:
Suprabha B S, Pai S M. Ankylosis of primary molar along with congenitally missing first permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2006;24, Suppl S1:35-7

How to cite this URL:
Suprabha B S, Pai S M. Ankylosis of primary molar along with congenitally missing first permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent [serial online] 2006 [cited 2019 Aug 17];24, Suppl S1:35-7. Available from: http://www.jisppd.com/text.asp?2006/24/5/35/26037



  Introduction Top


Ankylosis is an anomaly where there is fusion of alveolar bone with cementum and / or dentin, which occurs either before or after tooth eruption.[1] It occurs more commonly in molars, particularly mandibular second primary molar, while the incidence of ankylosis of primary molars is between 1.3 to 38.5 percent.[2],[3] The exact cause of ankylosis is still unknown, although factors like genetic tendency, traumatic injury to the bone and periodontal ligament, deficient local vertical bone growth, disturbance in local metabolism and local inflammation have been suggested.[3],[4]

Clinically, ankylosed primary molars often present with infraocclusion, as due to ankylosis the primary molars remain in fixed occlusal level while the neighbouring teeth erupt continuously due to vertical growth of alveolar bone. Hence, some other names attributed to this clinical condition are submersion, secondary retention and hypotrusion.[5] On percussion a sharp, solid sound is heard which is characteristic of ankylosis but this observation can be subjective.[4]

Radiographically, obliteration of the periodontal ligament space is noted. The roots are less radio opaque and as the ankylosis progresses, they are less distinguished from surrounding bone.[3] Histologically, areas of fusion of cementum and bone, periodontal ligament remnants which is fibrotic, with very few cells has been observed. No mucopolysaccharidase activity which is essential for normal process of root resorption during eruption of permanent successor is seen.[3],[6]

Ankylosis of primary molars has been reported to be associated with various anomalies in permanent dentition, like taurodontism of the first permanent molar, impaction of succedaneous tooth, ectopic eruption of premolars / canine, aplasia of second molars, tipping of the adjacent teeth and increased susceptibility to caries and periodontal disease.[7],[8]

Here is a report of a case with ankylosis of the second primary molar associated with congenitally missing first permanent molar and transposition of premolar.


  Case Report Top


A healthy 14 year old female patient reported to the Department of Pedodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, for routine checkup. On Oral examination the following teeth were present:

75 was over retained, 35 had erupted distal to 75 and was well aligned in the arch. Curiously the first permanent molar (36) was missing, for which there was no history of previous extraction. The over retained deciduous molar appeared to be stable with a class I occlusal pit cavity and revealed no signs of infraocclusion [Figure - 1],[Figure - 2],[Figure - 3]. Radiographic examination revealed gross resorption of the distal root while the mesial root appeared healthy. There was obliteration of periodontal ligament space around the mesial root [Figure - 4].

As the teeth were well aligned and there was no sign of infraocclusion, it was decided to keep the patient under observation. Hence, the class I occlusal pit cavity on 75 was restored with glass ionomer cement.


  Discussion Top


The occurrence of a congenitally missing first permanent molar is a rare finding as the common congenitally missing permanent teeth in the order of frequency are third molars, second premolars and lateral incisors.[10]

Due to the congenital absence of 36, the tooth germ of 35 had probably drifted distally and erupted distal to 75 causing resorption of distal root of the over retained molar in the process.[11],[12] This is an extreme case of ectopic eruption wherein, a tooth erupts normally in a position occupied by another tooth and may be termed as transposition.[13]

Transposition of teeth is less common in mandibular arch compared to maxillary arch. So far only mandibular incisor - canine transpositions have been reported.[14] This is a unique case where the second premolar has erupted in place of congenitally missing first permanent molar. The most common cause for change in the normal eruptive pattern in the mandibular arch is over-retained deciduous teeth. Positional changes of the anlagen at very early stages of odontogenesis as well as genetic control within the dental follicle are suggested as possible causative factors of tooth transposition.[15]

The prognosis of ankylosed teeth has been found to be unpredictable.[16],[17] Extensive root resorption due to pressure from erupting adjacent tooth irrespective of whether the successor tooth is present or not has been reported. But significantly the rate of such resportion is slow.[18] In a fifteen year follow up study, Hansen and Kjaer[16] have concluded that when there are no morphological abnormalities in the rest of the permanent dentition, the ankylosed primary molar persists for atleast fifteen years from its normal exfoliation time. In another longitudinal study Bjerklin and Bennett[17] found that if the primary molars persists upto twenty years of age, prognosis is good. Hence, in cases with agenesis of permanent teeth, it is inadvisable to extract the ankylosed primary molar, when there is no associated crowding of teeth. Though there is a risk of infraocclusion and tipping of adjacent teeth, it has been found to be clinically insignificant.[17] Also, in cases of transposition of teeth, usually the transposed order should be retained, as it has been shown that attempts at restoring the natural tooth position may lead to prolonged orthodontic treatment with less than adequate results, biologically and esthetically.[19]

In some cases, spontaneous eruption of the ankylosed teeth may occur due to resorption of localized areas of ankylosis.[20] This maybe the possible reason for absence of infraocclusion in the present case. As there was no associated infraocclusion at present and the tooth was well aligned at time of examination, no treatment was initiated. It was decided that the patient should be kept under observation considering the risk of progressive root resorption and infraocclusion of 75. At 1 year follow up examination no signs of infraclusion nor mobility was noted. Radiographic examination for further evidence of root resorption remained negative. Further long term follow up for at least 10 years is needed, to rule out occurence of infraocclusion and progressive root resorption.

If progressive root resorption occurs resulting in a mobile primary molar, extraction and replacement with autotransplanted upper third molar or by a resin bonded bridge should be done. If only infraocclusion develops, restoration of the ankylosed tooth with resin bonded onlays or resin bonded porcelain crowns are the treatment options that can be considered.[17]

 
  References Top

1.Brearley LJ, Mckibben DH. Ankylosis of primary teeth. J Dent Child 1973;40:54-60.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Biederman W. Etiology and treatment of tooth ankylosis. Am J Orthodont 1962;48:670-84.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Mancini G, Francini E, Vichi M, Tollaro I, Romagnoli P. Primary tooth ankylosis. Report of a case with histological analysis. J Dent Child 1965;62:215-9.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Raghoebar GM, Boering G, Stegenga B, Vissink A. Secondary retention in primary dentition. J Dent Child 1991;58:17-22.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  
5.Kurol J. Infraocclusion of primary molars: An epidemiologic and familial study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1981;9:94-102.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Haselden K, Hobkirk JA, Goodman JR, Jones SP, Hemmings KW. Root resorption in retained deciduous canine and molar teeth without permanent successors in patients with severe hypodontia. Int J Pediatr Dent 2001;11:171-8.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
7.Winter GB, Gelbier MJ, Goodman JR. Severe infraoclusion and failed eruption of deciduous molars associated with eruptive and developmental disturbances in the permanent dentition: A report of 28 selected cases. Br J Orthod 1997;24:149-57.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
8.Gary CR, Castellon EV, Codina XC, Escoda CG. Infraocclusion of primary molars: Reports of cases. J Dent Child 1998;65:47-51.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Pilo R, Littner MM, Marshak B. Severe infraocclusion ankylosis: Report of three cases. J Dent Child 1989;56:144-6.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Shafer WG, Hine MK, Levy BM. Developmental disturbances of oral and para oral structures. In : A text book of Oral Pathology. 4th ed. WB Saunder Co: Tokyo; 1993. p. 45-7.   Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Tencate AR. Shedding of deciduous teeth. In : Orban's Oral Histology. 11th ed. The CV Mosby Co: St. Louis; 1991. p. 386-405.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Saldariaga JR, Patino MC. Ectopic eruptions and severe root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003;123:259-65.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Peck S, Peck L. Classification of maxillary tooth transpositions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;107:505-17.  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
14.Shapira Y, Kuftinee MM. Early detection and prevention of mandibular tooth transposition. J Dent Child 2003;70:204-7.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Mandibular lateral incisor. Canine transposition, concomitant dental anomalies and genetic control. Amgle Orthod 1998;68:455-66.  Back to cited text no. 15  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
16.Hansen K, Kjaer I. Persistance of deciduous molars in subjects with agenesis of second premolars. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:239-43.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
17.Bjerklin K, Bennet J. The long term survival of lower second primary molars in subjects with agenesis of premolars. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:245-55.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Kurol J, Thailander B. Infraoculusion of primary molars with aplasia of permanent successors (a longitudinal study). Angle Orthod 2000;54:283-94.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Kavadia-Tsatala S, Sidiropoulou S, Kaklamanos EG, Chatziyanni A. Tooth transpositions, associated dental anomalies and treatment management in a sample of orthodontic patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003;28:19-26.  Back to cited text no. 19  [PUBMED]  
20.Darling AI, Levers BG. Submerged human deciduous molars and ankylosis. Arch Oral Biol 1973;18:1021-40.  Back to cited text no. 20  [PUBMED]  


    Figures

[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4]


This article has been cited by
1 Gutta percha root filling in 2nd primary molar teeth with missing successor: A challenging approach
Ansari, G., Mirkarimi
Research Journal of Medical Sciences. 2008; 2(5): 251-254
[Pubmed]
2 Treatment of space loss caused by submerged maxillary second primary molar
Karacay, S., Guven, G., Basak, F.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007; 25(1): 36-38
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (85 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


   Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed15382    
    Printed230    
    Emailed6    
    PDF Downloaded854    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal


Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 
  2005 - Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 
Online since 1st May '05