|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 36-39
Disappeared roots: A case report
R Arathi1, M Kundabala2, B Karen3
1 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore - 575 001, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore - 575 001, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Oral Pathology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore - 575 001, Karnataka, India
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore - 575 001, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Tooth resorption is a perplexing problem for all dental practitioners. The etiologic factors are vague, the diagnoses are educated guesses and, often, the chosen treatment does not prevent the rapid disappearance of the calcified dental tissues. This becomes all the more confusing if the tooth in question is a pulpally involved young permanent tooth. Presented in this report is the case of an upper first young permanent molar that underwent complete root resorption following root canal therapy and obturation.
Keywords: First permanent molar, post-root canal treatment complication, root resorption
|How to cite this article:|
Arathi R, Kundabala M, Karen B. Disappeared roots: A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008;26:36-9
| Introduction|| |
Tooth resorption is a perplexing problem for all dental practitioners. The etiologic factors are vague, the diagnoses are educated guesses and, often, the chosen treatment does not prevent the rapid disappearance of the calcified dental tissues.
The most common stimulating factor for root resorption is pulpal infection. Following injury to the predentin, infected dentinal tubules may stimulate an inflammatory process, with the consequent osteoclastic activity in the pulpal or periradicular tissues initiating internal or external root resorption. 
Resorbing cells are attracted to the area and act as scavengers, removing tissue debris and foreign bodies. , Phagocytosis is carried out by the mononuclear phagocyte system consisting of neutrophils, macrophages, and osteoclasts.
These resorbing cells require continuous stimulation for phagocytosis.  So when the irritating factor or source of infection is removed, phagocytosis is automatically reduced or stopped. When the trauma or irritation is severe, more pronounced inflammatory changes lead to resorption of the cementum. When the cementum layer is broken, the exposed dentin resorbs at a faster rate,  resulting in complete resorption of the roots.
Presented in this report is a case of an upper first permanent molar that underwent complete root resorption.
| Case Report|| |
A healthy girl, aged 12 years, reported to the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, with a complaint of tooth mobility in relation to the upper right first permanent molar. She gave a history of root canal treatment done on the same tooth 3 years back.
On examination a stainless steel crown was in place, with gingival recession exposing the cervical portion of the tooth; the tooth showed mild mobility [Figure - 1].
IOPA revealed complete resorption of the roots. The guttapercha obturation material was embedded in the bone [Figure - 2]. Some of the gutta-percha cones were broken and were detached from the master cone. No radiographic changes in the bone could be seen around any of the gutta-percha points. Normal bone deposition was seen in the areas of root resorption (replacement resorption).
The radiographs that had been taken 3 years back after the completion of root canal therapy were obtained. It is interesting to note that the tooth was then immature and the root canal therapy, followed by obturation with gutta-percha, was done on a tooth with an open apex, without obtaining an adequate apical seal [Figure - 3]. The patient had been asymptomatic for the last 3 years.
The tooth was extracted under local anesthesia. The extraction socket was shallow due to the bone deposition that had occurred simultaneously with the root resorption [Figure - 4]. There were problems while trying to retrieve the gutta-percha cones that were embedded in the bone; barbed broach was used to retrieve the gutta-percha cones.
The roots of the extracted tooth were completely resorbed, with the gutta-percha cones projecting out [Figure - 5]. The extraction site healed uneventfully [Figure - 6].
Granulation tissue from the extraction site, which also included a piece of calcified tissue that was embedded in the soft tissue, was sent for histopathologic examination. Histologic pictures revealed that the calcified tissue was a root piece that had probably broken off during the resorption process. The resorption was visible as a scooped-out area on the root surface. No odontoclasts were seen in the granulation tissue [Figure - 7].
| Discussion|| |
Tooth resorption is a physiologic or pathologic interactive process, involving inflammatory cells, resorbing cells, and hard tissue structures which is similar to bone resorption.
Regardless of its cause, it is ultimately the result of osteoclastic activity on the root surface of the involved tooth. Microscopically, it varies from small areas of cementum resorption replaced by connective tissue or repaired by new cementum, to large areas of resorption replaced by osseous tissue, or "scooped-out" areas of resorption replaced by inflammatory or neoplastic tissues. 
Andreasen has shown that when the resorptive process penetrates the cementum and reaches the dentinal tubules of a tooth with a necrotic pulp, toxic elements from the pulp tissue diffuse into the resorptive cavity, thereby further stimulating inflammatory resorption. 
Even after endodontic therapy, residual bacteria that are trapped in accessory canals and dentinal tubules may stimulate the resorptive process. Ford, in a study with beagle dogs, found that 60% of roots with filled, but contaminated canals exhibited root resorption. 
Treatment decisions for a pulpally involved young permanent tooth requires careful assessment. There are many options available for the management of such teeth; one of which is obtaining an apical stop by favoring apical closure or apexification is the treatment of choice. The aim of this is to stimulate and preserve the formative activity of the cells in the apical part so as to enhance the formation of calcified callus in the wide apical opening. 
Obtaining a apical stop can also be achieved with materials like dentinal chips, tricalcium phosphate, freeze-dried cortical bone, freeze-dried dentin, dentinal shavings, etc., all of which would enable immediate filling of the root canals. ,
The potential for rapid and destructive inflammatory root resorption is very high in an endodontically treated young permanent tooth and, therefore, periodic recall evaluation is imperative. It is recommended that the patient be seen every 3 months, followed by re-evaluation over the next 5 years.
In the present case, the resorption was probably triggered by persisting inflammation or may have resulted because of seepage at the apex due to incomplete obturation. Persistent infection had led to continual root resorption, to the extent that there was complete loss of the root and replacement by osseous tissue.
| Conclusion|| |
The importance of a vital decision for a nonvital permanent tooth with an open apex cannot be overstressed. The root at the growing end is so thin and fragile that it breaks during obturation maneuvers, resulting in micro-gaps and leakage. Hence, to prevent the chance of root resorption and the loss of a permanent tooth at an early stage in life, the procedure should be chosen that provides an apical stop-either through multivisit or single visit apexification procedures; additionally, the patient should be scheduled for recall evaluation every 3 months over the next 5 years.
| References|| |
|1.||Fuss Z, Tsesis I, Lin S. Root resorption, diagnosis, classification and treatment choice based on stimulation factors. Dent Traumatol 2003;19:175-82 [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|2.||Hammarstrom L, Lindskog S. General morphological aspects of resorption of teeth and alveolar bone. Int Endodo J 1985;18:93-9 |
|3.||Tronstad L. Root resorption-etiology, terminology and clinical manifestations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988;4:241-51 [PUBMED] |
|4.||Shaw DR, Griffin FM Jr. Phagocytosis requires repeated triggering of macrophage phagocytic receptors during particle ingestion. Nature 1981;289:401-11 |
|5.||Gunraj MN. Dental root resorption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:647-53 [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|6.||Grossman LI, Oliet S, Del Rio CE. Endodontic practice. 11 th ed. Varghese Publishing House: Lea and Febiger; 1991 |
|7.||Andreasen JO, Andersen FM. Root resorption following traumatic dental injuries. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(suppl 1):95-114 |
|8.||Pitt Ford TR. The effects on the PA tissues of bacterial contamination of the filled root canal. Int Endod Jn 1982;15:16-22 |
|9.||Leiberman J, Trowbridge H. Apical closure of non vital permanent incisor teeth where no treatment was performed: A case report. J Endod 1983;9:257-60 |
|10.||Donald RM, James O' L, Cemil Y. Apexification: Review of a literature. Quintessence Int 1990;21(7):589-98 |
|11.||Bhaskar SN, Brady JM, Getter L, Grower MF, Driskell T. Biodegradable ceramic implants in bone: Electron and light microscopic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:336-46 |
[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4], [Figure - 5], [Figure - 6], [Figure - 7]
|This article has been cited by|
||Root Resorption -A Review
| ||Kavitha S |
| ||Journal of Scientific Dentistry. 2012; 2(1): 12 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|