|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 234-239
Maxillary labial frenum morphology and midline diastema among 3 to 12-year-old schoolgoing children in Sri Ganganagar city: A cross-sectional study
PT Jonathan1, Himani Thakur1, Abhiruchi Galhotra2, Virat Galhotra1, Neha Gupta1
1 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College and Research Centre, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India
2 Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
|Date of Web Publication||24-Sep-2018|
Dr. Virat Galhotra
House No. 600, Sector-7, Panchkula - 134 109, Haryana
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Introduction: Dentofacial aesthetics plays an important role in social interaction and psychological well-being because it affects how people perceive themselves and how they are perceived by society. The maxillary labial frenum is a fold of tissue, usually triangular in shape, extending from the maxillary midline area of the gingiva into the vestibule and mid portion of the upper lip. Maxillary anterior spacing or diastema is a common aesthetic complaint of patients and is frequently seen in children especially in the mixed dentition stage. Aims and Objectives: 1. To estimate the prevalence of different morphologic types of maxillary labial frenum among children of age 3 – 12 years. 2. To find out the relationship between the level of insertion of the frenum and age of the child.3. To evaluate the correlation between frenum morphology, insertion and midline diastema in children. Materials and Methodology: The direct visual method under natural light was used and the upper lip was lifted with the index finger and thumb of both hands which allowed for the observation and classification of the labial frenum morphology according to Sewerin's typology and its attachment according to Placek et al. The midline diastema was determined by measuring the distance between the midpoints of the mesial surfaces of both central incisors with the help of divider and ruler. The values were recorded in the prepared schedule. Summary and Conclusions: The presence of an abnormal frenum can be a cause in persistent midline diastemas. Tooth movement usually is deferred until eruption of the permanent canines but can begin early in certain cases with very large diastemas.
Keywords: Aberrant frenum, maxillary labial frenum, midline diastema
|How to cite this article:|
Jonathan P T, Thakur H, Galhotra A, Galhotra V, Gupta N. Maxillary labial frenum morphology and midline diastema among 3 to 12-year-old schoolgoing children in Sri Ganganagar city: A cross-sectional study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2018;36:234-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Jonathan P T, Thakur H, Galhotra A, Galhotra V, Gupta N. Maxillary labial frenum morphology and midline diastema among 3 to 12-year-old schoolgoing children in Sri Ganganagar city: A cross-sectional study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Oct 3];36:234-9. Available from: http://www.jisppd.com/text.asp?2018/36/3/234/241974
| Introduction|| |
Frenum is a fold of mucous membrane, usually with enclosed muscle fibers, that attaches the lips and cheeks to the alveolar mucosa and/or gingiva and the underlying periosteum., Frenum's primary function is to provide stability of the upper and lower lips and the tongue.
Within the first few months of fetal life, it emerges as a part of the oral cavity, along with the lips and the cheeks. As growth and development progresses, a prominence begins to appear in the middle part of the inner zone of the upper lip, and this becomes the tuberculum. About this time, another prominence forms on the anterior part of the palate and develops into the palatine papilla.
A continuous fold of tissue, the tectolabial frenum, connects the tuberculum with the palatine papilla (tectolabial frenum of the fetus simulates the abnormal frenum of postnatal life, in that it extends as a continuous band of tissue from the inner aspect of the upper lip, over and across the alveolar ridge, to be inserted in the palatine papilla). Normally, the growing alveolar process causes a severance of the continuous fold of tissue, dividing it into palatal and labial portions. The palatal part corresponds to the palatine papilla, and the labial tissue becomes the superior labial frenum, extending from the lip to the crest of the alveolar ridge.
There are no studies that establish a relationship between the different types of freni and the presence of the midline diastema in children in primary dentition. The most frequent frenum typology used is the one established by Sewerin. According to Miller, the frenum should be characterized as pathogenic when it is unusually wide or there is no apparent zone of attached gingiva along the midline, or the interdental papilla shifts when the frenum is extended.
Over the years, the relationship between the maxillary midline diastema and the labial frenum has been the subject of much controversy and confusion. In 1939, Hirschfield advocated frenectomy as a mucogingival procedure to eliminate the aforementioned pathologic situations caused by an abnormal frenum attachment. There is still a controversy among researchers concerning the need for it at all, as well as the right time for frenectomy.
The aims and objectives of the present study are as follows:
- To estimate the prevalence of different morphologic types of maxillary labial frenum among children aged 3–12 years
- To find out the relationship between the level of insertion of the frenum and age of the child
- To evaluate the correlation between frenum morphology, insertion, and midline diastema in children.
| Materials and Methods|| |
For this study, 1200 children aged 3–12 years from different schools of Sri Ganganagar city, Rajasthan, were enrolled. These students were categorized into three groups as follows:
- Group I: 3–5 years
- Group II: 6–9 years
- Group III: 10–12 years.
The direct visual method under natural light was used and the upper lip was lifted with the index finger and thumb of both hands, which allowed for the observation and classification of the labial frenum morphology according to Sewerin's typology and its attachment according to Mirko et al.
Sewerin's typology of maxillary labial frenum is as follows:
- Simple frenum – Frenum with nichum
- Persistent tectolabial – Bifid frenum
- Simple with appendix – Double frenum
- Simple with nodule – Frenum with two or more variations.
Attachment of labial frenum by Placek et al. is as follows:
- Papillary penetrating.
The study population was selected based on the following inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Schoolgoing children aged 3–12 years and children having normal dentition with no or minimal crowding.
Children with any systemic illness, any orofacial syndromes, cleft lip abnormalities, congenital deformities relating to the upper lip and supporting oral musculature, those who have experienced any surgeries or traumatic injuries to the labial frenum, those with loss of maxillary anterior teeth following trauma, those with interproximal caries or restorations in the upper central incisors, those with any alterations in size and shape of the upper central incisors, and those with any type of previous interceptive and corrective orthodontic treatment.
Mouth mirror, probe, tweezer (API), kidney tray, disposable gloves, disposable mouth masks, cotton roll and gauze pieces, Savlon (Johnson & Johnson Pvt Ltd, Tokai), torch, divider, and ruler.
The area of Sri Ganganagar was divided into four zones and all the schools present in Sri Ganganagar were divided accordingly.
- Zone I: East zone
- Zone II: West zone
- Zone III: North zone
- Zone IV: South zone.
From each zone, five schools were selected randomly and sixty children aged 3–12 years were selected randomly from each school. Then, the study program was started in those selected schools through proper channel.
Clinical examination was carried out by the principal researcher. General intraoral examination was done by using a mouth mirror and explorer. Chemical method of sterilization and disinfection was done by using Savlon (Johnson & Johnson Ltd.) which contains chlorhexidine gluconate and a strong cetrimide solution equivalent to 0.6%. These instruments were sterilized by mixing 1 part of Savlon with 3 parts of water. The children were made to sit comfortably on the ordinary chair and clinical examination was carried out. The direct visual method under natural light was used and the upper lip was lifted with the index finger and thumb of both hands, which allowed for the observation and classification of the labial frenum, according to the Sewerin's typology. The level of insertion of the maxillary labial frenum was also evaluated according to the classification proposed by Mirko et al. It was noted in the schedule whether the frenum was attached to the alveolar mucosa, gingiva, interdental papilla, or penetrating incisive papilla. Blanching test was used to confirm the level of attachment.
Data were analyzed using the computer software, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 10 (Nie, Bent and Hull (1970), IBM corporation). Data were expressed in its frequency and percentage. To elucidate the associations and comparisons between different parameters, Chi-square (χ2) test was used as nonparametric test. One-way analysis of variance was performed as parametric test to compare different variables. For all statistical evaluations, P < 0.005 was considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
[Table 1] shows the sample characteristics, and the study population was divided into three groups, namely 3–5 years, 6–9 years, and 10–12 years.
[Table 2] shows the prevalence of different morphologic types of maxillary labial frenum in the study sample. In the present study, the most prevalent morphologic type of maxillary labial frenum was the simple type. The number of simple, persistent tectolabial, simple with nodule, and simple with appendix frenum was 825 (68.7%), 184 (15.3%), 124 (10.3%), and 61 (5%) respectively. Double frenum and two or more variations at the same time were seen in 4 (0.3%) and 2 (0.16%) children, respectively.
On assessing the types of maxillary labial frenum in different age groups, it was found that simple frenum showed the highest prevalence in 10–12 years' age group and persistent tectolabial type was more common in 3–5 years' age group [Table 3].
[Table 4] depicts the level of insertion of maxillary labial frenum in the study, and it was found that the frenum was inserted into the alveolar mucosa in 571 (47.5%), in the gingiva in 458 (38.1%), and penetrating the incisive papilla in 171 children (14.2%). Maxillary labial frenum was seen inserted more frequently in the alveolar mucosa in children of 10–12 years' age group (58.3%). The gingival and incisive papillary insertion was more common in children of 6–9 years' and 3–5 years' age groups.
|Table 4: Level of insertion of maxillary labial frenum in each age group|
Click here to view
The relationship between morphologic types of maxillary labial frenum and level of insertion of frenum was evaluated, and it was found that the simple frenum was mostly inserted in the gingiva and alveolar mucosa and persistent tectolabial type penetrating the incisive papilla [Table 5].
|Table 5: Association between maxillary labial frenum and level of insertion|
Click here to view
In the present study, the midline diastema was measured, and it was found that out of 1200 children, 501 children (41.75%) presented with a midline diastema >0.5 mm. To further evaluate midline diastema, children were divided into three groups, i.e., mild (0.5–1.5 mm), moderate (1.6–2.5 mm), and severe (>2.5 mm) [Table 6].
The prevalence of midline diastema in each age group was assessed, and it was found that midline diastema was more in the 6–9 years' age group [Table 7].
The relationships between morphologic types of maxillary labial frenum and midline diastema were assessed in the study, and it was found that among children with midline diastema, 52.6% had simple frenum and 35.9% had persistent tectolabial frenum. Midline diastema >2.5 mm was more prevalent with persistent tectolabial type of frenum.
The relationships between morphologic types of maxillary labial frenum and midline diastema were assessed in the study, and it was found that among children with midline diastema, 52.6% had simple frenum and 35.9% had persistent tectolabial frenum [Table 8].
|Table 8: Association between maxillary labial frenum and midline diastema|
Click here to view
[Table 9] predicts the relationship between the level of insertion of maxillary labial frenum and midline diastema, and it was found that diastema >2.5 mm was more common in children with frenum penetrating the incisive papilla.
| Discussion|| |
Sewerin's typology was used in classifying the frenum, and it was found that the most prevalent morphologic type of maxillary labial frenum was the simple type with the prevalence of 68.7% followed by persistent tectolabial frenum with the prevalence of 15.3%. Simple with nodule and simple with appendix type were seen in 10.3% and 5% of children, respectively. Similar results were reported in the studies by Díaz-Pizán et al. and Alessandra et al. (2007) where the simple upper labial frenum showed the highest prevalence followed by the persistent tectolabial, simple with nodule, simple with appendix, double, coincidence of two or more variations or abnormalities, and frenum with nichum and bifid types.
In the present study, the types of maxillary labial frenum in different age groups were assessed, and it was found that simple frenum showed the highest prevalence in 10–12 years' age group and persistent tectolabial type was more prevalent in 3–5 years' age group. These findings are in consistent with the results of the studies conducted by Walter and Díaz-Pizán et al.
In the present study, in 47.6% of children, the frenum was inserted into the alveolar mucosa; in 38% of children, it was inserted in the gingiva; and in 14.4% of children, it was seen penetrating the incisive papilla. Similar findings were reported in the study by Alessandra et al. (2007) who studied the frenum attachments and found that the attachments to alveolar mucosa were the most prevalent followed by insertion in the gingiva, interdental papilla, and penetrating the incisive papilla.
In the present study, the level of gingival insertion was seen differing according to the age. Maxillary labial frenum was seen inserted more frequently in the alveolar mucosa in 10–12 years' age group (58.3%). The gingival and papillary insertion was more common in 3–5 years' and 6–9 years' age groups. In the study on maxillary labial frenum morphology, Díaz-Pizán et al. reported that the level of gingival insertion of frenum moved apically with age. This corroborates with the findings of the present study. The relationship between maxillary labial frenum morphology and level of insertion of frenum was evaluated in the present study, and was found that the simple frenum was mostly inserted in the gingival and alveolar mucosa, with persistent tectolabial frenum penetrating the incisive papilla. Simple frenum with appendix and nodule were mainly inserted in the alveolar mucosa.
The prevalence of midline diastema in the sample population was found to be 41.75%. Midline diastema was divided into three groups: mild (0.5–1.5 mm), moderate (1.5–2.5 mm), and severe (>2.5 mm). Mild diastema was seen in 18.75% of children, moderate in 15.5%, and severe in 7.5% of children. Longitudinal studies of Bergström et al., Popovich et al., Taylor, and Weyman confirm the hypothesis that the midline diastema is decreasing with increasing age of the individual and higher prevalence was mostly seen before the eruption of the lateral incisors. Richardson et al. concluded in their study that the highest prevalence of diastema was found to be at the 8-year age level. The prevalence increased from 6 years to 8 years and it gradually decreased by 14 years.
In the discussion about the relationship between diastema and frenum, authors like Angle, Taylor, Dewel, Vono et al., Edwards, Araujo and Bolognese argued that the low insertion or abnormal frenum is responsible for the midline diastema. A study by Baume (1950) reported that the abnormal frenum is the result of diastema while pressure from the adjacent teeth is insufficient to produce its atrophy. Studies by Ceremello have demonstrated the independence of maxillary labial frenum and midline diastema.
| Conclusion|| |
The following conclusions were derived from the results of the study:
- The most prevalent morphologic type of maxillary labial frenum was the simple type which increased significantly with age followed by persistent tectolabial frenum which decreased significantly with age (P < 0.001)
- The commonest location of frenum attachment was alveolar mucosa followed by gingiva and papillary penetrating incisive papilla. The level of insertion tends to move apically and thus the prevalence of insertion into the alveolar mucosa increased significantly with age (P < 0.001)
- The prevalence of midline diastema in the sample population was found to be 42.2% and midline diastema was more prevalent in the 6–9 years' age group. The prevalence of midline diastema decreased significantly in children with erupted permanent canines
- A statistically significant relationship was found between midline diastema and persistent tectolabial frenum and a significant inverse relationship was found between the level of gingival insertion and midline diastema (P < 0.001).
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge ML, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA. Malocclusion: Esthetic impact and quality of life among Brazilian schoolchildren. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:424-7.
Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Periodontal plastic and esthetic surgery. In: Carranza FA, editor. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. 10th
ed. Missouri: Saunders, An Imprint of Elsevier Science; 2006. p. 1023-4.
Mintz SM, Siegel MA, Seider PJ. An overview of oral frena and their association with multiple syndromic and nonsyndromic conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:321-4.
Noyes FB, Schor I, Noyes HJ. Dental Histology and Embryology. Ch. 2. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1938. p. 42-3.
Bhaskar SN. Orban's Oral Histology and Embryology. 11th
ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991.
Sewerin I. Prevalence of variations and anomalies of the upper labial frenum. Acta Odontol Scand 1971;29:487-96.
Miller PD Jr. The frenectomy combined with a laterally positioned pedicle graft. Functional and esthetic considerations. J Periodontol 1985;56:102-6.
Mittal M, Murray AM, Sandler PJ. Maxillary labial frenectomy: Indications and technique. Dent Update 2011;38:159-62.
Mirko P, Miroslav S, Lubor M. Significance of the labial frenum attachment in periodontal disease in man. Part I. Classification and epidemiology of the labial frenum attachment. J Periodontol 1974;45:891-4.
Díaz-Pizán ME, Lagravère MO, Villena R. Midline diastema and frenum morphology in the primary dentition. J Dent Child (Chic) 2006;73:11-4.
Alessandra TB, Patrick VQ, Weber L, Walter LM. Description of morphology of upper labial frenum in students from Teresina. Rev Cir Traumatol Buci Maxillofac 2007;7:59-64.
Walter LR. Prevalence of two different types of frenum. Ass Rev Paul Cir Dent 1980;34:426-30.
Bergström K, Jensen R, Mårtensson B. The effect of superior labial frenectomy in cases with midline diastema. Am J Orthod 1973;63:633-8.
Popovich F, Thompson GW, Main PA. The maxillary interincisal diastema and its relationship to the superior labial frenum and intermaxillary suture. Angle Orthod 1977;47:265-71.
Taylor JE. Clinical observations relating to the normal and abnormal frenum labii superians. Am J Orthod 1939;25:646-60.
Weyman J. The incidence of median diastemata during the eruption of the permanent teeth. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1967;17:276-8.
Richardson ER, Malhotra SK, Henry M, Little RG, Coleman HT. Biracial study of the maxillary midline diastema. Angle Orthod 1973;43:438-43.
Angle EH. Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth. 7th
ed. Philadelphia: S.S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.; 1907.
Dewel BF. The normal and the abnormal labial frenum; clinical differentiation. J Am Dent Assoc 1946;33:318-29.
Vono BG, de Freitas MI, del Tarquino B. A research on incisal diastema – Labial frenum (author's transl). Rev Bras Odontol 1973;30:138-41.
Edwards JG. The diastema, the frenum, the frenectomy: A clinical study. Am J Orthod 1977;71:489-508.
Araujo LG, Bolognese AM. Diastema interincisal and frenum abnormal. Rev Bras Odont 1983;40:20-8.
Baume LJ. Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion. I. The biogenetic course of the deciduous dentition. J Dent Res1950;29:123-32.
Ceremello PJ. The upper lip frenum and the midline diastema and their relation to growth and development of the oral structures. Am J Orthod 1953;39:120-39.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9]
|This article has been cited by|
||Association between superior labial frenum and maxillary midline diastema — a systematic review
| ||Sandra Tadros, Tom Ben-Dov, Éadaoin Ó. Catháin, Carlita Anglin, Max M. April |
| ||International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2022; 156: 111063 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Comparative frenectomy with conventional scalpel and dual-waved laser in labial frenulum
| ||Ling Xie, Ping Wang, Yue Ding, Liang Zhang |
| ||World Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2022; 5(1): e000363 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Etiological Factors of the Midline Diastema in Children: A Systematic Review
| ||Sivakumar Nuvvula, Sravani Ega, Sreekanth Kumar Mallineni, Basim Almulhim, Abdullah Alassaf, Sara Ayid Alghamdi, Yong Chen, Sami Aldhuwayhi |
| ||International Journal of General Medicine. 2021; Volume 14: 2397 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Clinical Consensus Statement: Ankyloglossia in Children
| ||Anna H. Messner, Jonathan Walsh, Richard M. Rosenfeld, Seth R. Schwartz, Stacey L. Ishman, Cristina Baldassari, Scott E. Brietzke, David H. Darrow, Nira Goldstein, Jessica Levi, Anna K. Meyer, Sanjay Parikh, Jeffrey P. Simons, Daniel L. Wohl, Erin Lambie, Lisa Satterfield |
| ||Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 2020; 162(5): 597 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|