|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 46-54
Antimicrobial efficacy of nanosilver and chitosan against Streptococcus mutans, as an ingredient of toothpaste formulation: An in vitro study
Faiyaz Ahmed1, ST Prashanth1, Kumari Sindhu1, Amit Nayak2, Sushmita Chaturvedi1
1 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, V S Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, R V Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
|Date of Web Publication||25-Feb-2019|
Dr. Faiyaz Ahmed
Dr. Ahmed's Dental Home, B/63, Road No. A/13, Alinagar Colony, Anisabad, Patna - 800 002, Bihar
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Context: Dental caries is the most prevalent oral infection affecting the humankind worldwide, and Streptococcus mutans is the major microrganism involved in its pathology. Mechanical plaque control in children is not performed efficiently and thus necessitates the inclusion of certain antimicrobial agents in the toothpaste. Aim: To analyze the antibacterial efficacy of nanosilver, chitosan, and fluoride as an ingredient in the dentifrices against S. mutans strains and comparing them with each other. Subjects and Methods: Pure culture of S. mutans strain (MTCC 890) was obtained from the Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. Nanosilver (Group 1)- and chitosan (Group 2)-containing toothpastes were obtained from the respective dealers, and fluoride (Group 3) toothpaste was obtained from the local market. The antimicrobial activity of the three toothpastes was determined by modified agar well diffusion method. Saline was kept as the control. Statistical Analysis Used: Unpaired t-test was done for intergroup comparisons. Results: Statistically significant differences between Groups 1 and 2, Groups 1 and 3, and Groups 2 and 3 were seen. Conclusions: Nanosilver-containing toothpaste has the highest antibacterial efficacy against S. mutans, followed by fluoride- and chitosan-containing toothpaste.
Keywords: Chitosan, dental caries, dentifrices, fluoride, nanosilver, Streptococcus mutans
|How to cite this article:|
Ahmed F, Prashanth S T, Sindhu K, Nayak A, Chaturvedi S. Antimicrobial efficacy of nanosilver and chitosan against Streptococcus mutans, as an ingredient of toothpaste formulation: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2019;37:46-54
|How to cite this URL:|
Ahmed F, Prashanth S T, Sindhu K, Nayak A, Chaturvedi S. Antimicrobial efficacy of nanosilver and chitosan against Streptococcus mutans, as an ingredient of toothpaste formulation: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 Jun 25];37:46-54. Available from: https://www.jisppd.com/text.asp?2019/37/1/46/252856
| Introduction|| |
Oral health has a strong correlation with the overall health of an individual. Continuous oral microbial exposure leads to the early development of caries in children. To combat these potentially harmful microbes, ingredients possessing antimicrobial activity are included in several oral hygiene products. The cooperative effects of brushing and using toothpaste containing certain chemical agents aid in the removal of the hazardous biofilm on the enamel.,,, Further, this prevention is much easier and economical than a later intervention.
The inclusion of certain chemical agents in toothpaste to combat oral pathologies has been widely accepted. Chitosan and nanosilver particles are two such ingredients. Chitosan is present in insects' exoskeletons. Nanosilver is pure deionized water with silver in suspension. Endogenous oral bacterial species such as Streptococcus mutans play a major role in the initiation and progression of dental caries. This study focuses on the efficacy of chitosan, nanosilver, and fluorides as an ingredient in the dentifrices against S. mutans.
| Subjects and Methods|| |
The present study was conducted in vitro on Mitis Salivarius agar culture media by modified agar well diffusion method. Data were collected by measuring the diameters of the inhibition zones.
Instruments and materials
(1) S. mutans (MTCC 890) strain, (2) nanosilver-containing toothpaste, (3) chitosan-containing toothpaste, (4) fluoridated toothpaste, (5) Mitis Salivarius agar, (6) gloves and mask, (7) kidney tray, (8) Petri dish More Detailses, (9) test tubes, (10) glass rods, (11) swabs, (12) dropper, (13) 8-mm sterile copper tube, (14) 5-ml plastic syringe, (15) saline, (16) distilled water, (17) vernier caliper, and (18) incubation chamber.
Procurement of the dentifrices
Fluoride toothpaste was obtained from the local market.
Nanosilver and chitosan toothpastes were obtained from the respective dealers [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: (From top to bottom) Nanosilver-, chitosan-, and fluoride-containing toothpastes|
Click here to view
The ingredients used in the manufacturing of the dentifrices as listed on the respective packages are shown in [Table 1].
Nanosilver- and chitosan-containing toothpastes did not contain any fluoride as their constituent.
Procurement of the microorganism
Pure cultures of S. mutans (MTCC 890) were obtained from the Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. It was cultured in brain–heart infusion broth (Hi-Media Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) at 37°C for 24 h [Figure 2]. This 24-h broth culture was later used to streak the dried agar plates with the microorganism.
Evaluation of dentifrices
The three different toothpastes were procured for the assessment of their in vitro antimicrobial activity against S. mutans. The selected dentifrice solutions were then made. For this, first 2.0 g of the toothpastes was measured by a sensitive scale. This calculated amount was transferred to a beaker to make the solutions. Now, 2.0 ml of sterile pyrogen-free distilled water was added to the beaker. The mixture was stirred carefully not to produce froth. This gave us a 1:1 dilution of the toothpastes for the experiment. The solutions were transferred to smaller test tubes. The samples hence produced were labeled as A, B, C, and D [Figure 3] as follows:
- Sample A – Nanosilver
- Sample B – Chitosan
- Sample C – Fluoride
- Sample D – Saline (control).
These samples later acted as the test Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 for the antimicrobial assay.
The antimicrobial activity of the toothpastes was determined by modified agar well diffusion method. In this method, 20 Mitis Salivarius agar plates were prepared containing 10% sucrose [Figure 4]. These plates were then seeded with 0.5 ml of 24 h broth cultures of S. mutans [Figure 2]. The plates were allowed to dry for 1 h.
A sterile 8-mm copper tube [Figure 5] was used to cut four equidistant wells in each of the plates [Figure 6]. A volume of 0.2 ml of nanosilver toothpaste (Group A) solution was introduced into one of the four wells. Similarly, 0.2 ml of chitosan (Group B) and fluoride toothpaste (Group C) solutions was introduced in two other wells. One well had 0.2 ml of saline (Group D) to act as control [Figure 7].
|Figure 7: Samples introduced into the agar plates and kept for incubation|
Click here to view
All the wells were oriented and labeled in the same manner. The plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h. [Figure 8] After 24 h, the plates were observed for zones of inhibition [Figure 9]. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated by measuring the diameter of zones of inhibition (in millimeter) with a vernier caliper [Figure 10]. The minimum diameter was taken as the observed value. The data hence collected were tabulated for analysis [Table 2].
Statistical technique used: Unpaired t-test.
Certain assumptions were anticipated for this test as follows:
- The sample drawn is random
- There is independence between the groups
- The data follow a normal distribution with mean and variance
- The variances of the two groups are equal.
Null hypothesis: There was no significant difference in the mean score recorded in the four groups, i.e., μ1 = μ2 = μ3 = μ4.
Decision criterion: The decision criterion was to reject the null hypothesis if P < 0.05. Otherwise, we accept the null hypothesis.
Statistical software: The statistical software used for analysis of the data was SPSS 20, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA. Microsoft Word and Excel were used to generate graphs and tables.
Distribution of scores in each group: Sample size in each group was 20.
| Results|| |
The highest mean score was recorded in Group 1 followed by Group 3 and Group 2, whereas Group 4 showed no zone of inhibition [Table 3] and [Figure 11].
|Table 3: Mean values of the diameters of zones of inhibition with standard deviations|
Click here to view
|Figure 11: Comparison of mean values of diameters of zones of inhibition of the four groups|
Click here to view
Unpaired t-test was used for intergroup comparisons.
Group 1 (nanosilver) and Group 2 (chitosan)
Mean score difference calculated was 9.3 with P < 0.0001. This result suggests that there was a statistically significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 [Table 4] and [Figure 12].
|Table 4: Differences between Group 1 and Group 2 with respect to mean score difference|
Click here to view
Group 1 (nanosilver) and Group 3 (fluoride)
Mean score difference calculated was 4.13 with P < 0.0001. This result suggests that there was a statistically significant difference between Groups 1 and 3 [Table 5] and [Figure 13].
|Table 5: Differences between Group 1 and Group 3 with respect to mean score difference|
Click here to view
Group 2 (chitosan) and Group 3 (fluoride)
Mean score difference calculated was 5.17 with P < 0.0001. This result suggests that there was a statistically significant difference between Groups 2 and 3 [Table 6] and [Figure 14].
|Table 6: Differences between Group 2 and Group 3 with respect to mean score difference|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Maintenance of good oral hygiene is the key to the prevention of dental diseases. The primary etiological factor for dental diseases is dental plaque., The formation of plaque on the tooth surface is characterized by the progression from a limited number of pioneer microbial species to the complex flora of mature dental plaque. This progression involves initial adherence of bacteria to the salivary pellicle and subsequent accumulation by growth and interbacterial adherence. Ultimately, the tooth surface gets coated with a dense, complex microcommunity that ends up in the destruction of hard enamel tissue.
S. mutans was selected as the test organism in this study because of there being promising evidence about it being the primary human odontopathogen in the etiology of dental caries. As such, dental caries is a diagnosable and treatable infection. Aciduricity appears to be the most consistent attribute of S. mutans that can be associated with both its selection in stagnant areas and cariogenicity. Other aciduric species such as S. sobrinus appears to be important primarily in smooth surface decay and as such, may be a cariogenic determinant when rampant decay occurs. Colonization by S. mutans occurs after tooth eruption, and if the fissures become colonized in their depths, then decay may be inevitable. However, if this colonization is delayed until the fissure depths are occupied by other bacteria, there is possibility that decay will not occur or its occurrence will be greatly reduced. This understanding of the ecology of S. mutans suggests that treatment strategies which interfere with the colonization of S. mutans may have a profound effect on the incidence of dental decay in human populations.
The modified agar well diffusion method is the method of choice for antimicrobial sensitivity test, in which the bacterial growth is done by streaking pure culture on agar plates. The same method was utilized by Prasanth (2011) to check the antimicrobial efficacy of five toothpastes and five mouthwashes. To culture facultative anaerobic S. mutans under microaerophilic/aerobic conditions in the absence of an anaerobic jar, the agar double-layer technique is a standard method. Cury et al. and Gomes et al. used the pour plate technique to culture S. mutan s for antibacterial activity test., In the present investigation, as in previous reports, the strain of S. mutans was cultured by the agar double-layer technique, and Mitis Salivarius agar, which contains 10% of sucrose, was used as the medium in order to simulate the oral conditions. Dental caries is caused by the combined effects of plaque accumulation and complex microbial communities, especially S. mutans, which is the first important colonizer of tooth surface in people who consume large amounts of sugary foods., Under this culture method, S. mutans strain could grow as a uniform lawn, although incubation was done under aerobic conditions. Hence, any antimicrobial agent is considered effective if the size of inhibition zone produced by it measures 2 mm or more.
The activities of oral microflora being responsible for mouth odor and most oral diseases are not in doubt. The need to keep these oral organisms to a level consistent with oral health by antimicrobial agent inclusion in dentifrice has been stressed. When these substances are added to oral products, they kill microorganisms by disrupting their cell walls and inhibiting their enzymatic activity. They also prevent bacterial aggregation, slow multiplication, and release endotoxins. Several clinical studies including that by Ciancio S (2003) have demonstrated the inhibitory effects of antimicrobial dentifrice on oral bacteria and gingiva.
Data from the present study are in support of this assertion as all the three investigated dental care products exhibited wide variations in their effectiveness against the test microorganism, S. mutans, a feature that may have been largely due to their antimicrobial active ingredients [Table 1]. All the tested dentifrices (Groups 1, 2, and 3) showed diameter of zones of inhibition more than 2 mm (which is considered positive) in contrast to the control (Group 4) which showed no zone of inhibition. The selected dentifrices had most of the ingredients similar in their manufacturing. Such a selection was done to avoid any deviation from the intended active ingredient's antimicrobial action. Other than the antimicrobial agent to be tested, all the other ingredients were regularly present in common dentifrices. Nanosilver- and chitosan-containing toothpastes did not contain any fluoride in their composition. Hence, the evaluation of the antimicrobial action can be regarded as more accurate in relation to the agent tested.
Among all the investigated toothpastes, Group 1 emerged as the most effective, based on the mean diameter of the zone of microbial inhibition produced by the toothpastes in agar well diffusion method, against the tested microorganism, i.e., S. mutans. The mean diameter of zone of inhibition was 20.14 ± 0.96 mm. This exceptional ability of Group 1 to retain its in vitro antimicrobial activity against S. mutans is notable. This might be due to the presence of nanosilver in its formulation.,,,,,,,,,,,,, This becomes more plausible as the utility and effectiveness of silver (Ag) nanoparticles in health-care industries has been reviewed by Prabhu and Poulose.
The mechanism of the inhibitory effects of Ag ions on microorganisms is partially known. Some studies have reported that the positive charge on the Ag ion is crucial for its antimicrobial activity through the electrostatic attraction between negatively charged cell membrane of microorganism and positively charged nanoparticles.,, In contrast, Sondi and Salopek-Sondi reported that the antimicrobial activity of Ag nanoparticles on Gram-negative bacteria was dependent on the concentration of Ag nanoparticle and was closely associated with the formation of “pits” in the cell wall of bacteria. Then, Ag nanoparticles accumulated in the bacterial membrane caused the permeability, resulting in cell death. However, because those studies included both positively charged Ag ions and negatively charged Ag nanoparticles, it is insufficient to explain the antimicrobial mechanism of positively charged Ag nanoparticles. Therefore, we expect that there is another possible mechanism. Amro et al. suggested that metal depletion may cause the formation of irregularly shaped pits in the outer membrane and change membrane permeability, which is caused by progressive release of lipopolysaccharide molecules and membrane proteins.
When evaluating any toothpaste, its possible adverse effects have to be taken into consideration. Gaillet and Rouanetindicated that Ag nanoparticles in toothpaste and other products may be associated with the development of inflammations of the gastrointestinal tract. However, because toothpaste is indicated for topical rather than systemic use and that too in small quantities, adverse reactions are unlikely.
Next to nanosilver, Group 3 showed the maximum antibacterial effect against S. mutans. The mean diameter of inhibition was evaluated to be 16.01 ± 2.68 mm, which was significant. This may be due to the ingredients present in their formulations. This dentifrice contained sodium fluoride (1000 ppm) as an active ingredient. Fluorides are abundantly used in many oral health products including toothpastes and mouthrinses as they help in caries prevention. If formulated correctly and used as directed, fluoride toothpaste helps to safely and effectively prevent tooth decay. The ability of fluoride to inhibit or even reverse the initiation and progression of dental caries has been well documented. However, if the bacterial challenge is too high, it is not possible for fluoride to overcome the challenge completely. In a previous study, Jenkins stated that fluoride products such as toothpaste formulations have shown to reduce caries between 30% and 70% compared with no fluoride therapy. A combination of nanosilver and fluoride was created as nanosilver fluoride (NSF) and tested by Santos et al. and the authors demonstrated that NSF is effective to arrest active dentinal caries and does not cause staining.
Group 2 was the least effective as compared to the other two toothpastes, but still showed significant effect when compared to the control group (Group 4). The mean diameter of zone of inhibition in this group was 10.84 ± 0.27 mm. This may be due to the presence of chitosan as the active ingredient. The general properties and applications of chitosan have been reviewed by Dutta et al. (2002) where they have suggested greater antierosive and antiplaque activities of chitosan in contrast to its antimicrobial activity. A possible explanation of the lesser antimicrobial effect of chitosan can be the chemical interaction between chitosan and an anionic-forming detergent as chitosan is itself a multicationic compound.
Chitosan is a natural polysaccharide derived from chitin, mainly from the shells of shrimps and other crustaceous. It is a biopolymer which is positively charged and strongly binds with its amino groups to surfaces with negative zeta potential, such as dental hard tissues. The reactive molecule chitosan reacts with the enamel surface and leads to a coverage of, at least, a thin, ubiquitous chitosan layer. Such chitosan-based layers have a thickness of few nanometers and are, therefore, not visible under scanning electron microscope. Various studies have evaluated the antierosive property of chitosan.,, Schlueter et al. (2013) suggested that a positive control of chitosan without abrasive challenges was able to reduce tissue loss by 78%.
It is known that a balance exists in a person's oral microbial population. If this balance is lost, opportunistic microorganisms can proliferate, enabling the initiation of disease processes. Therefore, the formulation identified as having the largest microbial inhibition zone, and thus probably having the strongest antimicrobial properties, may not be necessarily superior to that with smaller diameter inhibition zones. Because the formulation used in vivo is likely to be diluted by saliva, the level to which antimicrobial properties are buffered or lost in dilution in vitro is of interest.
This testing method also functioned as a screening method, which may not have been able to detect the effects of a chemical agent that does not diffuse through the agar matrix. More importantly, the test was conducted in vitro, so it cannot be assumed that the results of antimicrobial efficacy could be proportional or transferable to the oral cavity and translated into clinical effectiveness. Studies have demonstrated that the bacteria in biofilm forms such as plaque have decreased sensitivity to antibacterial agents. Moreover, formulations for topical antimicrobial oral use, such as dentifrices, must be able to penetrate the biofilm matrix and deliver the active agents quickly because exposure times are limited under actual conditions. Nevertheless, the in vitro method is a well-established technique that is used commonly in screening the antimicrobial efficacy of chemicals before in vivo testing.
| Conclusions|| |
This in vitro comparative study assessed the antimicrobial efficacy of nanosilver-, chitosan-, and fluoride-containing toothpastes against S. mutans through agar well diffusion method. It was hence concluded that:
- All the tested experimental groups were found to have an antibacterial efficacy against S. mutans
- Nanosilver had the highest antibacterial efficacy against S. mutans followed by fluoride toothpaste and chitosan
- The control group, that is, saline showed no antibacterial effect.
Hence, it can be concluded that the toothpaste formulations containing nanosilver particles can be an effective method of plaque control.
Furthermore, chitosan, having an acceptable antibacterial effect as well as having an already established antierosive property, can be a promising plaque control method.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Sheiham A. Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children. Br Dent J 2006;201:625-6.
Tanzer JM, Livingston J, Thompson AM. The microbiology of primary dental caries in humans. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1028-37.
Cancro LP, Fischman SL. The expected effect on oral health of dental plaque control through mechanical removal. Periodontol 2000 1995;8:60-74.
Chang YC, Huang FM, Tai KW, Chou MY. The effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine on cultured human periodontal ligament cells. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:446-50.
Beaudouin E, Kanny G, Morisset M, Renaudin JM, Mertes M, Laxenaire MC, et al.
Immediate hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine: Literature review. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;36:123-6.
Gultz J, Kaim JM, DeLeo J 4th
, Scherer W. An in vivo
comparison of the antimicrobial activities of three mouthrinses. J Clin Dent 1998;9:43-5.
Klingberg G, Broberg AG. Dental fear/anxiety and dental behaviour management problems in children and adolescents: A review of prevalence and concomitant psychological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007;17:391-406.
Zheng LY, Zhu JF. Study on antimicrobial activity of chitosan with different molecular weights. Carbohydr Polym 2003;54:527-30.
Jones CM, Hoek EM. A review of the antimicrobial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. J Nanopart Res 2010;12:1531-51.
Socransky SS, Haffajee AD. Periodontal microbial ecology. Periodontol 2000 2005;38:135-87.
Gamboa F, Estupinan M, Galindo A. Presence of Streptococcus mutans
in saliva and its relationship with dental caries: Antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates. Univ Sci 2004;9:23-7.
Loesche WJ. Role of Streptococcus mutans
in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev 1986;50:353-80.
Köhler B, Andréen I, Jonsson B. The effect of caries-preventive measures in mothers on dental caries and the oral presence of the bacteria Streptococcus mutans
and lactobacilli in their children. Arch Oral Biol 1984;29:879-83.
Prasanth M. Antimicrobial efficacy of different toothpastes and mouthrinses: An in vitro
study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2011;8:85-94.
Cury JA, Rocha EP, Koo H, Francisco SB, Del Bel Cury AA. Effect of saccharin on antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine gel. Braz Dent J 2000;11:29-34.
Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Rosalen PL, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, et al. In vitro
antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide pastes and their vehicles against selected microorganisms. Braz Dent J 2002;13:155-61.
Kolenbrander PE, London J. Adhere today, here tomorrow: Oral bacterial adherence. J Bacteriol 1993;175:3247-52.
Collee JG, Dunguid JP, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A. Laboratory control of antimicrobial therapy. In: Mackie, McCartney, editors. Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th
ed. Edinburgh, London, Melbourne and New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1989. p. 151-78.
Ciancio S. Improving oral health: Current considerations. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30 Suppl 5:4-6.
Slawson RM, Trevors JT, Lee H. Silver accumulation and resistance in Pseudomonas stutzeri
. Arch Microbiol 1992;158:398-404.
Zhao G, Stevens SE Jr. Multiple parameters for the comprehensive evaluation of the susceptibility of Escherichia coli
to the silver ion. Biometals 1998;11:27-32.
Danilczuk M, Lund A, Sadlo J, Yamada H, Michalik J. Conduction electron spin resonance of small silver particles. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2006;63:189-91.
Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee HJ, et al.
Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2007;3:95-101.
Feng QL, Wu J, Chen GQ, Cui FZ, Kim TN, Kim JO, et al.
Amechanistic study of the antibacterial effect of silver ions on Escherichia coli
and Staphylococcus aureus
. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:662-8.
Matsumura Y, Yoshikata K, Kunisaki S, Tsuchido T. Mode of bactericidal action of silver zeolite and its comparison with that of silver nitrate. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:4278-81.
Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, Holt K, Kouri JB, Ramírez JT, et al.
The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2005;16:2346-53.
Hatchett DW, Henry S. Electrochemistry of sulfur adlayers on low-index faces of silver. J Phys Chem 1996;100:9854-9.
Shrivastava S, Bera T, Roy A, Singh G, Ramachandrarao P, Dash D. Characterisation of enhanced antibacterial effects of novel silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2007;18:1-9.
Li WR, Xie XB, Shi QS, Duan SS, Ouyang YS, Chen YB, et al.
Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles on Staphylococcus aureus
. Biometals 2011;24:135-41.
Kim SH, Lee HS, Ryu DS, Choi SJ, Lee DS. Antibacterial activity of silver-nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus
and Escherichia coli
. Korean J Microbiol Biotechnol 2011;39:77-85.
Zarei M, Jamnejad A, Khajehali E. Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles against four foodborne pathogens. Jundishapur J Microbiol 2014;7:e8720.
Maiti S, Krishnan D, Barman G, Ghosh SK, Laha JK. Antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles synthesized from Lycopersicon esculentum
extract. J Anal Sci Technol 2014;5:40.
Junevičius J, Žilinskas J, Česaitis K, Česaitienė G, Gleiznys D, Maželienė Ž, et al.
Antimicrobial activity of silver and gold in toothpastes: A comparative analysis. Stomatologija 2015;17:9-12.
Prabhu S, Poulose EK. Silver nanoparticles: Mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. Int Nano Lett 2012;2:1-10.
Hamouda T, Myc A, Donovan B, Shih AY, Reuter JD, Baker JR Jr., et al.
Anovel surfactant nanoemulsion with a unique non-irritant topical antimicrobial activity against bacteria, enveloped viruses and fungi. Microbiol Res 2001;156:1-7.
Dibrov P, Dzioba J, Gosink KK, Häse CC. Chemiosmotic mechanism of antimicrobial activity of Ag(+) in Vibrio cholerae
. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:2668-70.
Dragieva I, Stoeva S, Stoimenov P, Pavlikianov E, Klabunde K. Complex formation in solutions for chemical synthesis of nanoscaled particles prepared by borohydride reduction process. Nanostruct Mater 1999;12:267-70.
Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: A case study on E. coli
as a model for gram-negative bacteria. J Colloid Interface Sci 2004;275:177-82.
Amro NA, Kotra LP, Wadu-Mesthrige K, Bulychev A, Mobashery S, Liu G. High-resolution atomic force microscopy studies of the Escherichia coli
outer membrane: Structural basis for permeability. Langmuir 2000;16:2789-96.
Gaillet S, Rouanet JM. Silver nanoparticles: Their potential toxic effects after oral exposure and underlying mechanisms – A review. Food Chem Toxicol 2015;77:58-63.
Marinho VC. Cochrane reviews of randomized trials of fluoride therapies for preventing dental caries. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2009;10:183-91.
Featherstone JD. The continuum of dental caries – Evidence for a dynamic disease process. J Dent Res 2004;83:C39-42.
Jenkins GN. Recent changes in dental caries. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985;291:1297-8.
Santos VE Jr., Vasconcelos Filho A, Targino AG, Flores MA, Galembeck A, Caldas AF Jr., et al.
Anew “silver-bullet” to treat caries in children – Nano silver fluoride: A randomised clinical trial. J Dent 2014;42:945-51.
Dutta PK, Ravikumar MN, Dutta J. Chitin and chitosan for versatile applications. JMS Polym Rev 2002;42:307.
Dutta PK, Dutta J, Tripathi VS. Chitin and chitosan: Chemistry, properties and applications. J Sci Ind Res 2004;63:20-31.
Mohire NC, Yadav AV. Chitosan-based polyherbal toothpaste: As novel oral hygiene product. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21:380-4.
] [Full text]
Ganss C, von Hinckeldey J, Tolle A, Schulze K, Klimek J, Schlueter N, et al.
Efficacy of the stannous ion and a biopolymer in toothpastes on enamel erosion/abrasion. J Dent 2012;40:1036-43.
Pini NI, Lima DA, Lovadino JR, Ganss C, Schlueter N.In vitro
efficacy of experimental chitosan-containing solutions as anti-erosive agents in enamel. Caries Res 2016;50:337-45.
Schlueter N, Klimek J, Ganss C. Randomised in situ
study on the efficacy of a tin/chitosan toothpaste on erosive-abrasive enamel loss. Caries Res 2013;47:574-81.
Barry AL, Thornsberry C. Susceptibility tests: Diffusion test procedures. In: Balows A, editor. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 5th
ed. Boston: ASM International; 1991. p. 1117-25.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]
|This article has been cited by|
||Application of Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Agents in the Prevention and Treatment of Enamel Demineralization
| ||Jiarong Yan, Hongye Yang, Ting Luo, Fang Hua, Hong He |
| ||Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2022; 10 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Emergence of Nano-Dentistry as a Reality of Contemporary Dentistry
| ||Orest Kochan, Svitlana Boitsaniuk, Mariana Levkiv, Krzysztof Przystupa, Nadiia Manashchuk, Khrystyna Pohoretska, Natalia Chornij, Iryna Tsvyntarna, Liudmyla Patskan |
| ||Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(4): 2008 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Plant Extract-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles for Application in Dental Therapy
| ||Omnia Ahmed, Nicole Remaliah Samantha Sibuyi, Adewale Oluwaseun Fadaka, Madimabe Abram Madiehe, Ernest Maboza, Mervin Meyer, Greta Geerts |
| ||Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(2): 380 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Nanoparticles in caries prevention: A review
| ||Bollina Tejaswi, Vidya Gopal Sree, Elangovan Sivapriya, Durvasulu Archana, Angambakkam Rajasekaran PradeepKumar |
| ||Journal of Global Oral Health. 2021; 4: 56 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Current approaches for the exploration of antimicrobial activities of nanoparticles
| ||Nur Ameera Rosli, Yeit Haan Teow, Ebrahim Mahmoudi |
| ||Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. 2021; 22(1): 885 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Silver nanoparticles – possible applications and threats
| ||Marta Kedzierska, Katarzyna Milowska |
| ||Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Biologica et Oecologica. 2021; 17: 14 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
Use of Silver Nanomaterials for Caries Prevention: A Concise Review
| ||Iris Xiaoxue Yin, Irene Shuping Zhao, May Lei Mei, Quanli Li, Ollie Yiru Yu, Chun Hung Chu |
| ||International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2020; Volume 15: 3181 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Rapid microwave-assisted biosynthesis of chitooligosaccharide coated silver nanoparticles: assessments of antimicrobial activity for paediatric pulp therapy
| ||Subhathira Rajasekaran, Sneha S Rao, Pandurang Appana Dalavi, Ashwini Prabhu, Sukumaran Anil, Jayachandran Venkatesan, Sham S Bhat |
| ||Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2020; 11(4): 045018 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Nanoparticles as Anti-Microbial, Anti-Inflammatory, and Remineralizing Agents in Oral Care Cosmetics: A Review of the Current Situation
| ||Florence Carrouel, Stephane Viennot, Livia Ottolenghi, Cedric Gaillard, Denis Bourgeois |
| ||Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(1): 140 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Tackling Multidrug Resistance in Streptococci – From Novel Biotherapeutic Strategies to Nanomedicines
| ||Cinthia Alves-Barroco, Lorenzo Rivas-García, Alexandra R. Fernandes, Pedro Viana Baptista |
| ||Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020; 11 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|